Our Mission

Learn who we are and how we serve our community


Meet our leaders, trustees and team

ICSC Foundation

Support up-and-coming professionals

ICSC Exchange

Catch up on industry ideas, news and views


Check out wide-ranging resources that educate and inspire

Global Public Policy

Learn about the governmental initiatives we support


Connect with other professionals at a local, regional or national event

Professional Development

Grow your skills online, in a class or at an event with expert guidance

Find Members

Access our Member Directory and connect with colleagues

Find Outlets

Get data and contact information for shopping outlets

Find Jobs

Search and post jobs, upload your resume or find qualified candidates

Become a Member

Learn about how to join ICSC and the benefits of membership

Renew Membership

Stay connected with ICSC and continue to receive membership benefits

Global Public Policy

Supreme Court agrees to hear e-fairness case

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear South Dakota v. Wayfair, et al, a landmark court case regarding the collection of state sales tax. The plaintiff is challenging the existing requirement that only retailers with a physical presence in a state — in the form of stores or warehouses — can be required to pay state sales taxes, as upheld in the previous Supreme Court ruling, in Quill Corp. v. North Dakota, in 1992.

A total of 36 states and the District of Columbia had asked the high court to take up the issue. In a brief filed with the court, the states wrote: “As the volume of Internet-based retail transactions continues to compound daily, the physical-presence rule exacts an ever-increasing toll on the States’ fiscal health.”

ICSC, which leads the Marketplace Fairness Coalition, has lobbied for e-fairness for more than 25 years and submitted an amicus brief to the court in November.

“The Supreme Court’s decision today is an important and necessary step forward toward updating the law on remote sales and tax collection so that it reflects the realities of today’s marketplace,” said Tom McGee, president and CEO of ICSC. “The distorting effects of Quill Corp. v. North Dakota have had a far-reaching impact beyond brick-and-mortar stores. While the retail sector continues to innovate, the existing laws are decades behind. The current, outdated system places millions of American jobs at risk, because the government is picking winners and losers.

“It’s time to level the playing field for online and brick-and-mortar retailers. A sale is a sale regardless of whether it takes place on Main Street or on the Internet. The same rules that apply to local businesses across our nation should apply to online-only retailers. Communities across the country rely on sales-tax revenue to provide fundamental services, including police and firefighters. We hope this decision represents a step forward that brings parity to sales-tax collection.”

The court is expected to hear arguments in April and to rule on the issue at the end of its nine-month term in late June.

Stephanie Lockwood

Director, Advocacy Communications

Related Topics:

  • e-fairness
  • marketplace fairness
  • supreme court

Take action

With just a few clicks you can send a message to Congress on the issues that impact our industry.

Visit the Legislative Action Center