| ICSC Legal Database - Cases | Monday, February 22, 1999 05:06 PM |
| Citation: |
| 1009 Second Avenue Associates v. New York City Off-Track Betting Corp., 669 N.Y.S. 2d 540 (App. Div. 1st |
| Issue: |
| When the landlord could not deliver the premises to the new tenant due to the existing tenant's holding over, the |
| landlord sued for the amount of rent the new tenant would have paid. The court applied and reviewed contract |
| law, holding that only damages within the contemplation of the parties at the time of the contract were |
| recoverable. The lease contained a clause allowing consequential damages if the landlord wanted to demolish |
| the building. The court reasoned that consequential damages were extraordinary, and the parties only provided |
| for their recovery under certain specified circumstances. The landlord could not recover the lost rent as |
| consequential damages because that was not allowed under the lease. |
| Classification 1: |
| Landlord and Tenant |
| 01557 - Legal Update - Summer 1998 |
|