Legal
What's New Research Government Site Index Home Meetings Directories About ICSC Search ICSC Sign On Publications Education Help Messages



ICSC Legal Database - CasesMonday, February 22, 1999 05:01 PM

Case Index:
00139

Citation:
Atlantic Financial v. Orianna, 406 Pa.Super. 316, 594 A.2d 356 (1991).

Issue:
Whether summary judgment is properly granted in favor of a mortgagee if the parties to the mortgage dispute

the existence of an oral agreement to forebear from foreclosure.

Facts:
Plaintiff, Atlantic Financial financed a total of 42 mortgages for defendant, Orianna, involving two commercial

condominium projects. In August 1990, Atlantic filed a complaint in mortgage foreclosure against Orianna,

asserting default on twelve of the mortgages. In its answer, Orianna denied being in default and argued that

Atlantic had orally agreed to forebear from foreclosure action. At the time Atlantic made its motion for summary

judgment, the only evidence of an agreement to forebear was contained in a letter written by Orianna to Atlantic

after foreclosure

proceedings began. The letter referred to an "understanding" between the panics which would cause the suit to

be dismissed. Additionally, an Orianna agent testified in his deposition that the parries made an oral agreement

to forebear. The trial court granted Atlantic's motion for summary judgment on the grounds that an agreement to

forebear from mortgage foreclosure was subject to the Statute of Frauds. Accordingly, an oral agreement was

unenforceable. Orianna appealed the judgment on the grounds that the existence of the agreement was a

disputed issue of material fact and the Statute of Frauds was inapplicable to the agreement in question.

Holding:
Affirmed. The court found the Statute of Frauds applicable in the absence of an assertion by Orianna that

application of the Statute would increase the chances of fraud or perjury. Furthermore, because Orianna's

actions led to foreclosure, an argument that the Statute did not apply would be unconvincing. The court

determined that the only evidence of an agreement to forebear was a unilateral, vague ,. expression of an

understanding made after Atlantic instituted suit. Orianna's agent's deposition acknowledged that the agreement

was oral. The Statute of Frauds precluded enforcement of an oral agreement to forebear. Summary judgment

therefore was properly granted.

Publication:
Legal Update

Date:
Winter 1991

Classification 1:
Mortgages

Classification 2:

Classification 3:

00139 - Legal Update - Winter 1991