22
 MembershipMeetingsPublicationsEducationEmploymentResearchDirectoriesGovernmentInternational
 


 


April 21, 2000, Volume 1, Number 16

TRACKING THE TRACKERS:
A LOOK AT THE LEADING INTERNET RESEARCH ORGANIZATIONS

BY David Brand

Unless you were living without any connection to the outside world during the business week that ended on April 14, 2000, then chances are you did not miss the precipitous 25.3% drop in the Nasdaq composite index or the 7.3% decline in the Dow Jones industrial average. While there was a slight rebound in the days that followed, the stocks of online retailers are still trading far from the highs of the last year. For example, eToys, once considered a front-runner in the online toy game, has recently traded as low as $4.50 a share, off nearly 95% from its 52-week high of $86. Even the so-called giants in the e-commerce category have been humbled, as Amazon.com, which traded at $113 a share in the last year has seen its shares trade as low as $40.81 (-64%) in the last year. A closer look reveals that this downturn has not just affected online retailers, but also the companies that have been active in projecting online sales.

As pointed out previously in ICSC's Research Quarterly, a "cottage industry" has grown around estimating the consumer sales generated via online channels.1 Instead of looking at the various forecasts from these companies, which are widely available, ICSC decided at this time to study the financial performances of the publicly held Internet research firms. We have listed these below and have also included, for reference, those that are privately held, currently dependent on venture capital, or subsidiaries of larger companies. (See Table 1.) Please note that forecasting consumer online sales is just a small part of what these companies do, as many of them also investigate the technology and business-to-business marketplaces, among other things.

Table 1

Publicly held Internet research companies

Research companies funded by venture capital

Research companies that are subsidiaries of publicly held companies

Privately held research companies

Gartner Group, Inc

Bizrate.com

International Data Corp. (International Data Group)

eMarketer

Giga Information Group

Greenfield Consulting Group

The Yankee Group (Primark)

Boston Consulting Group

Forrester Research, Inc.

CyberDialogue

Simba (Primedia)

 

Jupiter Communications

Gomez Advisors

Zona (Intelliquest)

 

Harris Interactive

     
Source: Individual company Web sites

Table 2 provides us with some insight into the financial performance of the five major publicly held researcher firms that provide data on online sales. While most of the stocks of these companies are trading nearer to their 52-week lows than their highs, it is notable that Forrester's stock is now well above its 52-week low. In light of this recent performance, it may be interesting to note that Forrester has set itself apart from its rivals as of late, "predicting that because of weak financials, competition and investor flight, most Internet-only retailers will be out of business by 2001."2

Table 2

Research company

1999 Revenue

(000)

1998 Revenue

(000)

Stock price as of close 4/20/00

52-week high

% change

from high

52-week low

Gartner Group, Inc.

$734,234

$641,957

12.9

24.9

(48%)

9.6

Forrester Research, Inc.

$87,268

$40,421

40.9

65.1

(37%)

10.5

Giga Information Group

$38,759

$19,659

6.3

15.0

(58%)

2.7

Jupiter Communications, Inc.

$38,084

$14,748

23.6

47.4

(50%)

16.6

Harris Interactive, Inc.

$28,965

$26,291

3.4

24.0

(86%)

3.9

Source: The Street.com

Since many firms collect revenue from other efforts, especially conferences, a look at the proceeds generated strictly from research is necessary. The Gartner Group, with the greatest intake of the five, enjoyed a 10.6% increase in research revenue for fiscal 1999 over fiscal 1998. The largest percentage gain from 1998 to 1999 was realized by Jupiter (+274%). (See Table 3.)

Table 3

Research Company

Fiscal 1999 Research Revenue (000)

Fiscal 1998 Research Revenue (000)

% Change

Gartner Group

$479, 045

$433,141

10.6%

Forrester Research

$64,697

$46,842

38.1%

Giga Information Group

$45,257

$31,789

42.4%

Jupiter Communications

$23,134

$6,183

274.2%

Harris Interactive

$21,837

$13,465

62.2%

Source: Securities and Exchange Commission filings

Looking at the impressive gains illustrated in Table 3, one might be initially puzzled as to the recent stock performance of these companies. In Table 4, we see another, perhaps more critical gauge of company performance, profitability. While some have yet to show profits, it does appear that they are moving in the right direction. The question may be how much time investors give them to reach a substantial level of profitability. It may be no coincidence that the company in this table that saw its net loss widen also experienced very poor stock performance over the last year.

Table 4

Research Company

Fiscal 1999 Net Income/Loss (000)

Fiscal 1998 Net Income/Loss (000)

% Change

1999 Profit Margin

(Pretax)

Gartner Group

$88,894

$88,347

0.6%

19.0%

Forrester Research

$10,981

$7,547

45.5%

20.1%

Jupiter Communications

$(630)

$(2137)

70.5%

(2.2%)

Harris Interactive

$(8,800)

$(3,500)

(151.4%)

(30.5%)

Giga Information Group

$(17,328)

$(18,728)

7.5%

(46.4%)

Source: Securities and Exchange Commission filings

Until recently, stocks of online retailers were skyrocketing as a result of investor confidence in a wired marketplace. At this time it would appear that this exuberance is waning, or at the very least, on hold. Could the same also be said in regard to the companies that make it part of their business to study e-commerce? True, while the downward trend in the performance of these researcher's stocks may be attributable to the descent of the technology market sector in general, we can't help but wonder if other factors are also at work here.

We are currently on the threshold of a demystification of the "science" of reporting Internet sales. The Department of Commerce released its first report on e-commerce in March, and will eventually release online sales on a category-by-category basis. This may reduce the demand for sales "estimates" from numerous independent firms. According to some analysts, we will soon see the "winnowing out" of superfluous dot-coms;3 may we yet see the same process among the Internet researchers? Indeed, this will an area worth watching in the long term.

1 Baker, Michael. The New Cottage Industry-Forecasting Internet Retail Sales. ICSC Research Quarterly, Winter 1998-99
2 Hobson, Katherine. Value Managers Eye Bargain Basement E-Tail Stocks. The Street.com, 19 Apr 2000.

3 Lohr, Steve. Stocks' Slide May Spark a Dot-Com Shakeout. The New The New York Times, 17 Apr 2000